Authors: Stef Benstead and Emma Nock
This paper is the first in a series of three reports looking cumulatively at the need to replace the Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) with a proper system of assessment and support designed with and by people who have an illness, health condition or disability that makes it difficult or impossible to work. Extensive investigation, backed by research, demonstrates that ESA and the accompanying Work Capability Assessment (WCA) are not fit for purpose.
This Ekklesia paper, researched by Stef Benstead and Emma Nock, and supported with funding from the St Joseph’s Province Passionists’ Grants Fund, looks in depth at the support needs of people with chronic illness, based on a detailed online survey in parallel with other research.
The conclusion is clear: the government can provide the support needed for those with chronic illness to work, and then ask such people as are able to undertake that work; or it can reduce expenditure in that area and properly enable those with chronic illness to live lives that contribute to a good society in other ways, without conditions. But the government cannot have it both ways; it cannot refuse to pay the cost of employment support and simultaneously insist that individuals with chronic illness prepare for work that is simply not possible for them.
Read and download the free pdf in your browser here.
An Executive Summary to accompany the report is available to read here.
The publisher is Ekklesia.
Replacing Employment and Support Allowance © Ekklesia 2016.
All Rights Reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher except for the quotation of brief passages in reviews.
This briefing was written to alert people to the impact on disabled benefits claimants of the Employment and Support Allowance (Amendment) Regulations 2012 reference no 3096.
Members of Spartacus Network bust the dangerous myths and misinformation that has grown up around ESA.
The Spartacus Network show how Government policies are unfair, unreasonable and in conflict with International Human Rights.
Steve Griffiths explains how the introduction of more means testing in the ESA further damages the lives and families of disabled people.
Simon Duffy argues that the current ESA system is deeply flawed and suggests an alternative based on a better understanding of unemployment.